I am trying to perform swiftUI instrumentation on my ios app. whenever i hit the rocord button, the app launches on target device and closes with the error: Failed to start the recording: Failed starting ktrace session. How do i resolve this please?

Hi, How to enable multitouch on ARView? Touch functions (touchesBegan, touchesMoved, ...) seem to only handle one touch at a time. In order to handle multiple touches at a time with ARView, I have to either: Use SwiftUI .simultaneousGesture on top of an ARView representable Position a UIView on top of ARView to capture touches and do hit testing by passing a reference to ARView Expected behavior: ARView should capture all touches via touchesBegan/Moved/Ended/Cancelled. Here is what I tried, on iOS 26.1 and macOS 26.1: ARView Multitouch The setup below is a minimal ARView presented by SwiftUI, with touch events handled inside ARView. Multitouch doesn't work with this setup. Note that multitouch wouldn't work either if the ARView is presented with a UIViewController instead of SwiftUI. import RealityKit import SwiftUI struct ARViewMultiTouchView: View { var body: some View { ZStack { ARViewMultiTouchRepresentable() .ignoresSafeArea() } } } #Preview { ARViewMultiTouchView() } // MARK: Representable ARView struct ARViewMultiTouchRepresentable: UIViewRepresentable { func makeUIView(context: Context) -> ARView { let arView = ARViewMultiTouch(frame: .zero) let anchor = AnchorEntity() arView.scene.addAnchor(anchor) let boxWidth: Float = 0.4 let boxMaterial = SimpleMaterial(color: .red, isMetallic: false) let box = ModelEntity(mesh: .generateBox(size: boxWidth), materials: [boxMaterial]) box.name = "Box" box.components.set(CollisionComponent(shapes: [.generateBox(width: boxWidth, height: boxWidth, depth: boxWidth)])) anchor.addChild(box) return arView } func updateUIView(_ uiView: ARView, context: Context) { } } // MARK: ARView class ARViewMultiTouch: ARView { required init(frame: CGRect) { super.init(frame: frame) /// Enable multi-touch isMultipleTouchEnabled = true cameraMode = .nonAR automaticallyConfigureSession = false environment.background = .color(.gray) /// Disable gesture recognizers to not conflict with touch events /// But it doesn't fix the issue gestureRecognizers?.forEach { $0.isEnabled = false } } required dynamic init?(coder decoder: NSCoder) { fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented") } override func touchesBegan(_ touches: Set<UITouch>, with event: UIEvent?) { for touch in touches { /// # Problem /// This should print for every new touch, up to 5 simultaneously on an iPhone (multi-touch) /// But it only fires for one touch at a time (single-touch) print("Touch began at: \(touch.location(in: self))") } } } Multitouch with an Overlay This setup works, but it doesn't seem right. There must be a solution to make ARView handle multi touch directly, right? import SwiftUI import RealityKit struct MultiTouchOverlayView: View { var body: some View { ZStack { MultiTouchOverlayRepresentable() .ignoresSafeArea() Text("Multi touch with overlay view") .font(.system(size: 24, weight: .medium)) .foregroundStyle(.white) .offset(CGSize(width: 0, height: -150)) } } } #Preview { MultiTouchOverlayView() } // MARK: Representable Container struct MultiTouchOverlayRepresentable: UIViewRepresentable { func makeUIView(context: Context) -> UIView { /// The view that SwiftUI will present let container = UIView() /// ARView let arView = ARView(frame: container.bounds) arView.autoresizingMask = [.flexibleWidth, .flexibleHeight] arView.cameraMode = .nonAR arView.automaticallyConfigureSession = false arView.environment.background = .color(.gray) let anchor = AnchorEntity() arView.scene.addAnchor(anchor) let boxWidth: Float = 0.4 let boxMaterial = SimpleMaterial(color: .red, isMetallic: false) let box = ModelEntity(mesh: .generateBox(size: boxWidth), materials: [boxMaterial]) box.name = "Box" box.components.set(CollisionComponent(shapes: [.generateBox(width: boxWidth, height: boxWidth, depth: boxWidth)])) anchor.addChild(box) /// The view that will capture touches let touchOverlay = TouchOverlayView(frame: container.bounds) touchOverlay.autoresizingMask = [.flexibleWidth, .flexibleHeight] touchOverlay.backgroundColor = .clear /// Pass an arView reference to the overlay for hit testing touchOverlay.arView = arView /// Add views to the container. /// ARView goes in first, at the bottom. container.addSubview(arView) /// TouchOverlay goes in last, on top. container.addSubview(touchOverlay) return container } func updateUIView(_ uiView: UIView, context: Context) { } } // MARK: Touch Overlay View /// A UIView to handle multi-touch on top of ARView class TouchOverlayView: UIView { weak var arView: ARView? override init(frame: CGRect) { super.init(frame: frame) isMultipleTouchEnabled = true isUserInteractionEnabled = true } required init?(coder: NSCoder) { fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented") } override func touchesBegan(_ touches: Set<UITouch>, with event: UIEvent?) { let totalTouches = event?.allTouches?.count ?? touches.count print("--- Touches Began --- (New: \(touches.count), Total: \(totalTouches))") for touch in touches { let location = touch.location(in: self) /// Hit testing. /// ARView and Touch View must be of the same size if let arView = arView { let entity = arView.entity(at: location) if let entity = entity { print("Touched entity: \(entity.name)") } else { print("Touched: none") } } } } override func touchesCancelled(_ touches: Set<UITouch>, with event: UIEvent?) { let totalTouches = event?.allTouches?.count ?? touches.count print("--- Touches Cancelled --- (Cancelled: \(touches.count), Total: \(totalTouches))") } }

The document-based SwiftUI example app (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swiftui/building-a-document-based-app-with-swiftui) doesn't specify a launch image. It would seem per the HIG that the "pinkJungle" background in the app would be a decent candidate for a launch image, since it will be in the background when the document browser comes up. However when specifying it as the UIImageName, it is not aligned the same as the background image. I'm having trouble figuring out how it should be aligned to match the image. The launch image seems to be scaled up a bit over scaledToFill. I suppose a launch storyboard might make this more explicit, but I still should be able to do it without one. This is the image when displayed as the launch image: and this is how it's rendered in the background right before the document browser comes up:

List { Text("ITEM 1") .onHover(perform: { hovering in debugPrint("hovering: ", hovering) }) .help("ITEM 1") Text("ITEM 2") .onHover(perform: { hovering in debugPrint("hovering: ", hovering) }) .help("ITEM 2") Text("ITEM 3") .onHover(perform: { hovering in debugPrint("hovering: ", hovering) }) .help("ITEM 3") } .fixedSize(horizontal: false, vertical: true) .frame(maxHeight: 200) } Hello everyone!!! Considering the snippet above, seems like the onHover action, including help modifiers, doesn't work for the elements of a List, on macOS Tahoe. The situation changes using a ScrollView embedding a LazyVStack, or disabling Liquid Glass from the info plist, so my guess is that the new Liquid Glass style has something to do with this issue though I didn't find any clue about it. Does anyone have any idea? Maybe there's a layer above that doesn't allow to trigger the onHover modifier? Thanks in advance for your help!

What is the correct way to implement scrolling in a looong list that uses ScrollView and LazyVstack Imagine I have some api that returns a longs list of comments with replies The basic usecase is to scroll to the bottom(to the last comment) Most of the time this works fine But, imagine some of the comments have many replies like 35 or more (or even 300) User expands replies for the first post, then presses scroll to bottom. The scrollbar reaches the bottom and I see the blank screen. Sometimes the scrollbar may jump for a while before lazyvstack finishes loading or until I manually scroll up a bit or all the way up and down What should I do in this case? Is this the swiftui performance problem that has no cure? Abstract example: ScrollViewReader { proxy in ScrollView { LazyVStack { ForEach(comments) { comment in CommentView(comment: comment) .id("comment-\(comment.id)") } } } } struct CommentView: View { let comment: Comment @State var isExpanded = false var body: some View { VStack { Text(comment.text) if isExpanded { RepliesView(replies: comment.replies) // 35-300+ replies } } } } ... scroll proxy.scrollTo("comment-\(lastComment.id)", anchor: .bottom)

For information I stumbled upon a regression with SwiftUI Slider on iOS 26. Its onEditingChanged closure might be called twice when interaction ends, with a final Boolean incorrect value of true provided to the closure. As a result apps cannot reliably rely on this closure to detect when an interaction with the slider starts or ends. I filed a feedback under FB20283439 (iOS 26.0 regression: Slider onEditingChanged closure is unreliable).

I'm using SwiftUI WebView and this error happens when app becomes inactive, the webview changes to blank, and will be in this state all along even if reopen a new webview. When I switch back to WKWebview, everything works fine. environment Xcode 26.1(17B55) on macOS 15.7.1 Error acquiring assertion: <Error Domain=RBSServiceErrorDomain Code=1 "((target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.rendering AND target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.networking AND target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.webcontent))" UserInfo={NSLocalizedFailureReason=((target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.rendering AND target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.networking AND target is not running or doesn't have entitlement com.apple.developer.web-browser-engine.webcontent))}> this is the code, pretty simple, in load() function i just call page.load(). WebView(vm.page) .onAppear { Task { await vm.load() } }

I’m seeing a strange visual bug in iOS 26 when building chat-style UIs that use an inverted ScrollView or List (via .rotationEffect(.radians(.pi)) and .scaleEffect(x: -1, y: 1)) to anchor messages at the bottom. When I add .ignoresSafeArea() to let the chat bleed behind the navigation bar - the new navigation bar fade (that subtle top-to-bottom gradient Apple added in iOS 26) behaves incorrectly. Instead of fading from the top of the screen toward the nav bar, it fades upward from the bottom of the view, effectively covering the entire screen with the gradient. This only happens when the view is inverted. If I remove .ignoresSafeArea(), the fade looks correct — but then my chat no longer extends behind the nav bar. It looks like the fade effect is being applied in the transformed coordinate space of the inverted scroll view rather than in visual screen space. I haven’t found a reliable workaround besides disabling the fade (which isn’t really possible). Has anyone found a proper solution or a modifier that prevents the fade inversion when using flipped ScrollViews? Would love to know if Apple is aware of this or if there’s a hidden API for disabling that fade effect. I have made a report about this in Feedback Assistant: FB20540755

I'm encountering unexpected behavior with @Binding in a UIViewRepresentable's Coordinator. The same Coordinator instance returns different values depending on how the property is accessed. Environment: iOS 17+ / Xcode 15+ SwiftUI with UIViewRepresentable Issue: When I access @Binding var test inside the Coordinator: ✅ Via self.test in Coordinator methods: Returns the updated value ❌ Via context.coordinator.test in updateUIView: Returns the stale/initial value Both access the same Coordinator instance (verified by memory address), yet return different values. Minimal Reproducible Example: struct ContentView: View { @State private var test: [Int] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] var body: some View { VStack { TestRepresentable(test: $test) Text("State: \(test.description)") } } } struct TestRepresentable: UIViewRepresentable { @Binding var test: [Int] func makeUIView(context: Context) -> UIButton { let button = UIButton(type: .system) button.setTitle("Toggle", for: .normal) button.addTarget( context.coordinator, action: #selector(Coordinator.buttonTapped), for: .touchUpInside ) return button } func updateUIView(_ uiView: UIButton, context: Context) { // Log coordinator instance address let coordAddr = String(describing: Unmanaged.passUnretained(context.coordinator).toOpaque()) print("[updateUIView] Coordinator address: \(coordAddr)") // Log values print("[updateUIView] self.test: \(self.test)") print("[updateUIView] context.coordinator.test: \(context.coordinator.test)") // These should be the same but they're not! // self.test shows updated value // context.coordinator.test shows stale value } func makeCoordinator() -> Coordinator { Coordinator(test: $test) } class Coordinator: NSObject { @Binding var test: [Int] var idx: Int = 0 init(test: Binding<[Int]>) { _test = test } @objc func buttonTapped() { idx += 1 if idx < test.count { test[idx] += 5 } // Log coordinator instance address let selfAddr = String(describing: Unmanaged.passUnretained(self).toOpaque()) print("[buttonTapped] Coordinator address: \(selfAddr)") // Log value - this shows the UPDATED value print("[buttonTapped] self.test: \(test)") } } } Actual Output: [Initial] [updateUIView] Coordinator address: 0x600001234567 [updateUIView] self.test: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [updateUIView] context.coordinator.test: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [After first tap] [buttonTapped] Coordinator address: 0x600001234567 [buttonTapped] self.test: [1, 7, 3, 4, 5] ✅ Updated! [updateUIView] Coordinator address: 0x600001234567 ← Same instance [updateUIView] self.test: [1, 7, 3, 4, 5] ✅ Updated! [updateUIView] context.coordinator.test: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] ❌ Stale! [After second tap] [buttonTapped] Coordinator address: 0x600001234567 [buttonTapped] self.test: [1, 7, 8, 4, 5] ✅ Updated! [updateUIView] Coordinator address: 0x600001234567 ← Same instance [updateUIView] self.test: [1, 7, 8, 4, 5] ✅ Updated! [updateUIView] context.coordinator.test: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] ❌ Still stale! Questions: Why does context.coordinator.test return a stale value when it's the same Coordinator instance? Is this intended behavior or a bug? What's the correct pattern to access Coordinator's @Binding properties in updateUIView? Workaround Found: Using self.test instead of context.coordinator.test in updateUIView works, but I'd like to understand why accessing the same property through context yields different results. Related: I've seen suggestions to update coordinator.parent = self in updateUIView, but this doesn't explain why the same object's property returns different values. Binding documentation states it's "a pair of get and set closures," but there's no explanation of how Context affects closure behavior. Any insights would be greatly appreciated! P.S - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69552418/why-does-a-binding-in-uiviewrepresentables-coordinator-have-a-constant-read-valu This is the link that I found out online with same problem that I have but not answered well.

Hello, I've a question about performance when trying to render lots of items coming from SwiftData via a @Query on a SwiftUI List. Here's my setup: // Item.swift: @Model final class Item: Identifiable { var timestamp: Date var isOptionA: Bool init() { self.timestamp = Date() self.isOptionA = Bool.random() } } // Menu.swift enum Menu: String, CaseIterable, Hashable, Identifiable { var id: String { rawValue } case optionA case optionB case all var predicate: Predicate<Item> { switch self { case .optionA: return #Predicate { $0.isOptionA } case .optionB: return #Predicate { !$0.isOptionA } case .all: return #Predicate { _ in true } } } } // SlowData.swift @main struct SlowDataApp: App { var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { let schema = Schema([Item.self]) let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: false) return try! ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) }() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(sharedModelContainer) } } // ContentView.swift struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @State var selection: Menu? = .optionA var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { List(Menu.allCases, selection: $selection) { menu in Text(menu.rawValue).tag(menu) } } detail: { DemoListView(selectedMenu: $selection) }.onAppear { // Do this just once // (0..<15_000).forEach { index in // let item = Item() // modelContext.insert(item) // } } } } // DemoListView.swift struct DemoListView: View { @Binding var selectedMenu: Menu? @Query private var items: [Item] init(selectedMenu: Binding<Menu?>) { self._selectedMenu = selectedMenu self._items = Query(filter: selectedMenu.wrappedValue?.predicate, sort: \.timestamp) } var body: some View { // Option 1: touching `items` = slow! List(items) { item in Text(item.timestamp.description) } // Option 2: Not touching `items` = fast! // List { // Text("Not accessing `items` here") // } .navigationTitle(selectedMenu?.rawValue ?? "N/A") } } When I use Option 1 on DemoListView, there's a noticeable delay on the navigation. If I use Option 2, there's none. This happens both on Debug builds and Release builds, just FYI because on Xcode 16 Debug builds seem to be slower than expected: https://indieweb.social/@curtclifton/113273571392595819 I've profiled it and the SwiftData fetches seem blazing fast, the Hang occurs when accessing the items property from the List. Is there anything I'm overlooking or it's just as fast as it can be right now?

Colombia is not yet listed as a Tap to Pay user, but it is in the process of becoming so. We are currently a group of developers at a company in Colombia working on a project to integrate Tap to Pay into our application. After reviewing Apple's documentation, my company is not certified to meet Apple's security requirements, PCI standards, or licensing requirements. However, the payment service provider we have contracted for this is in the process of obtaining the certifications, authorizations, and licenses that Apple specifies. Our team members and managers overseeing this Tap to Pay project have told us that we, as iOS developers, should integrate and use the Proximity Reader API, but we know that we, as developers, are not authorized by Apple to do so. Is the payment service provider the only one who can make this possible, enabling its use with NFC and Proximity Reader? I would like to know if the service provider will provide us with the SDK containing the Proximity Reader API for integration into the project, or if my company will have to implement the Proximity Reader API ourselves?

We have an UIViewController called InfoPlayerViewController. Its main subview is from a child view controller backed by SwiftUI via UIHostingController. The InfoPlayerViewController conforms to UIViewControllerTransitioningDelegate. The animation controller for dismissing is DismissPlayerAnimationController. It runs UIKit keyframe animations via UIViewPropertyAnimator. When the keyframe animation is executed there’s an occasional crash for end users in production. It only happens on iOS 26. FB Radar: FB20871547 An example crash is below. Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT) Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 Exception Reason: +[_SwiftUILayerDelegate _screen]: unrecognized selector sent to class 0x20c95da08 Termination Reason: SIGNAL 6 Abort trap: 6 Triggered by Thread: 0 Last Exception Backtrace: 0 CoreFoundation 0x1a23828c8 __exceptionPreprocess + 164 (NSException.m:249) 1 libobjc.A.dylib 0x19f2f97c4 objc_exception_throw + 88 (objc-exception.mm:356) 2 CoreFoundation 0x1a241e6cc +[NSObject(NSObject) doesNotRecognizeSelector:] + 364 (NSObject.m:158) 3 CoreFoundation 0x1a22ff4f8 ___forwarding___ + 1472 (NSForwarding.m:3616) 4 CoreFoundation 0x1a23073a0 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 96 (:-1) 5 UIKitCore 0x1a948e880 __35-[UIViewKeyframeAnimationState pop]_block_invoke + 300 (UIView.m:2973) 6 CoreFoundation 0x1a22cb170 __NSDICTIONARY_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_BLOCK__ + 24 (NSDictionaryHelpers.m:10) 7 CoreFoundation 0x1a245d7cc -[__NSDictionaryM enumerateKeysAndObjectsWithOptions:usingBlock:] + 288 (NSDictionaryM.m:271) 8 UIKitCore 0x1a948e6bc -[UIViewKeyframeAnimationState pop] + 376 (UIView.m:2955) 9 UIKitCore 0x1a7bc40e8 +[UIViewAnimationState popAnimationState] + 60 (UIView.m:1250) 10 UIKitCore 0x1a94acc44 +[UIView(UIViewAnimationWithBlocks) _setupAnimationWithDuration:delay:view:options:factory:animations:start:animationStateGenerator:completion:] + 684 (UIView.m:17669) 11 UIKitCore 0x1a94ae334 +[UIView(UIViewKeyframeAnimations) animateKeyframesWithDuration:delay:options:animations:completion:] + 224 (UIView.m:17945) 12 MyApp 0x102c78dec static UIView.animateNestedKeyframe(withRelativeStartTime:relativeDuration:animations:) + 208 (UIView+AnimateNestedKeyframe.swift:10) 13 MyApp 0x102aef3c0 closure #1 in DismissPlayerAnimationController.slideDownBelowTabBarTransitionAnimator(using:) + 156 (DismissPlayerAnimationController.swift:229) 14 MyApp 0x102a2d3d4 <deduplicated_symbol> + 28 15 UIKitCore 0x1a7d5ae5c -[UIViewPropertyAnimator _runAnimations] + 172 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:2123) 16 UIKitCore 0x1a83e1594 __49-[UIViewPropertyAnimator startAnimationAsPaused:]_block_invoke_3 + 92 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:3557) 17 UIKitCore 0x1a83e1464 __49-[UIViewPropertyAnimator startAnimationAsPaused:]_block_invoke + 96 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:3547) 18 UIKitCore 0x1a83e1518 __49-[UIViewPropertyAnimator startAnimationAsPaused:]_block_invoke_2 + 144 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:3553) 19 UIKitCore 0x1a83e0e64 -[UIViewPropertyAnimator _setupAnimationTracking:] + 100 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:3510) 20 UIKitCore 0x1a83e1264 -[UIViewPropertyAnimator startAnimationAsPaused:] + 728 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:3610) 21 UIKitCore 0x1a83de42c -[UIViewPropertyAnimator pauseAnimation] + 68 (UIViewPropertyAnimator.m:2753) 22 UIKitCore 0x1a87d5328 -[UIPercentDrivenInteractiveTransition _startInterruptibleTransition:] + 244 (UIViewControllerTransitioning.m:982) 23 UIKitCore 0x1a87d5514 -[UIPercentDrivenInteractiveTransition startInteractiveTransition:] + 184 (UIViewControllerTransitioning.m:1012) 24 UIKitCore 0x1a7c7931c ___UIViewControllerTransitioningRunCustomTransitionWithRequest_block_invoke_3 + 152 (UIViewControllerTransitioning.m:1579) 25 UIKitCore 0x1a892aefc +[UIKeyboardSceneDelegate _pinInputViewsForKeyboardSceneDelegate:onBehalfOfResponder:duringBlock:] + 96 (UIKeyboardSceneDelegate.m:3518) 26 UIKitCore 0x1a7c79238 ___UIViewControllerTransitioningRunCustomTransitionWithRequest_block_invoke_2 + 236 (UIViewControllerTransitioning.m:1571) 27 UIKitCore 0x1a94ab4b8 +[UIView(Animation) _setAlongsideAnimations:toRunByEndOfBlock:animated:] + 188 (UIView.m:17089) 28 UIKitCore 0x1a7c79070 _UIViewControllerTransitioningRunCustomTransitionWithRequest + 556 (UIViewControllerTransitioning.m:1560) 29 UIKitCore 0x1a86cb7cc __77-[UIPresentationController runTransitionForCurrentStateAnimated:handoffData:]_block_invoke_3 + 1784 (UIPresentationController.m:1504) 30 UIKitCore 0x1a7c43888 -[_UIAfterCACommitBlock run] + 72 (_UIAfterCACommitQueue.m:137) 31 UIKitCore 0x1a7c437c0 -[_UIAfterCACommitQueue flush] + 168 (_UIAfterCACommitQueue.m:228) 32 UIKitCore 0x1a7c436d0 _runAfterCACommitDeferredBlocks + 260 (UIApplication.m:3297) 33 UIKitCore 0x1a7c43c34 _cleanUpAfterCAFlushAndRunDeferredBlocks + 80 (UIApplication.m:3275) 34 UIKitCore 0x1a7c1f104 _UIApplicationFlushCATransaction + 72 (UIApplication.m:3338) 35 UIKitCore 0x1a7c1f024 __setupUpdateSequence_block_invoke_2 + 352 (_UIUpdateScheduler.m:1634) 36 UIKitCore 0x1a7c2cee8 _UIUpdateSequenceRunNext + 128 (_UIUpdateSequence.mm:189) 37 UIKitCore 0x1a7c2c378 schedulerStepScheduledMainSectionContinue + 60 (_UIUpdateScheduler.m:1185) 38 UpdateCycle 0x28c58f5f8 UC::DriverCore::continueProcessing() + 84 (UCDriver.cc:288) 39 CoreFoundation 0x1a2323230 __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE0_PERFORM_FUNCTION__ + 28 (CFRunLoop.c:2021) 40 CoreFoundation 0x1a23231a4 __CFRunLoopDoSource0 + 172 (CFRunLoop.c:2065) 41 CoreFoundation 0x1a2300c6c __CFRunLoopDoSources0 + 232 (CFRunLoop.c:2102) 42 CoreFoundation 0x1a22d68b0 __CFRunLoopRun + 820 (CFRunLoop.c:2983) 43 CoreFoundation 0x1a22d5c44 _CFRunLoopRunSpecificWithOptions + 532 (CFRunLoop.c:3462) 44 GraphicsServices 0x2416a2498 GSEventRunModal + 120 (GSEvent.c:2049) 45 UIKitCore 0x1a7c50ddc -[UIApplication _run] + 792 (UIApplication.m:3899) 46 UIKitCore 0x1a7bf5b0c UIApplicationMain + 336 (UIApplication.m:5574) // ...

In the Keynote/Numbers/Pages apps for iPhone, there is a Help menu item for presenting a Help modal view. The view has a button for showing the hierarchical table of contents, and a field for searching the Help pages. How is such a Help modal view built through SwiftUI ? In which format is the Help content stored ?

Hi everyone, I’m currently experimenting an issue with TipKit’s popoverTip in combination with a TabView. On iOS 26, the popover tip keeps showing every time I switch tabs, even though it should only appear once. The same code behaves as expected on older iOS versions (for example, iOS 17 or 18), where the tip is displayed only once, as documented. Here’s a simplified example reproducing the issue: import TipKit struct ContentView: View { init() { try? Tips.configure() } var body: some View { TabView { VStack { Image(systemName: "globe") .imageScale(.large) .foregroundStyle(.tint) .popoverTip(HomeTip(), arrowEdge: .bottom) Text("Hello, world!") } .tabItem { Image(systemName: "house") Text("Home") } .tag(0) NavigationStack { List { Label("Reset Data store", systemImage: "gear") .onTapGesture { try? Tips.resetDatastore() } } .navigationTitle("Explore") } .tabItem { Image(systemName: "sparkles") Text("Settings") } .tag(1) } } private struct HomeTip: Tip { let id = "HomeTip" let title = Text("Test Tool Tip") } } Expected behavior: The tip appears once and does not reappear when switching between tabs. Observed behavior on iOS 26: The tip keeps reappearing every time the user switches back to the tab.

Any view that is content for the tabViewBottomAccessory API fails to retain its state as of the last couple of 26.1 betas (and RC). The loss of state happens (at least) when the currently selected tab is switched (filed as FB20901325). Here's code to reproduce the issue: struct ContentView: View { @State private var selectedTab = TabSelection.one enum TabSelection: Hashable { case one, two } var body: some View { TabView(selection: $selectedTab) { Tab("One", systemImage: "1.circle", value: .one) { BugExplanationView() } Tab("Two", systemImage: "2.circle", value: .two) { BugExplanationView() } } .tabViewBottomAccessory { AccessoryView() } } } struct AccessoryView: View { @State private var counter = 0 // This guy's state gets lost (as of iOS 26.1) var body: some View { Stepper("Counter: \(counter)", value: $counter) .padding(.horizontal) } } struct BugExplanationView: View { var body: some View { ScrollView { VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 16) { Text("(1) Manipulate the counter state") Text("(2) Then switch tabs") Text("BUG: The counter state gets unexpectedly reset!") } .multilineTextAlignment(.leading) } } }

I'm experiencing a critical issue with SwiftData custom migrations where objects created during migration appear to be inserted successfully but aren't persisted or found by queries after migration completes. The migration logs show objects being created, but subsequent queries return zero results. I'm migrating from schema version V2 to V2_5, which involves: Renaming Person class to GroupData Keeping the same data structure but changing the class name while keeping the old class. Using a custom migration stage to copy data from old to new schema Below is an extract of my two schema and migration plan: Environment: Xcode 16.0, iOS 18.0, Swift 6.0 SchemaV2 enum LinkMapV2: VersionedSchema { static let versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(2, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [AnnotationData.self, Person.self, History.self] } @Model final class Person { @Attribute(.unique) var id: UUID var name: String var photo: String var requirement: String var statue: Bool var annotationId: UUID? var number: Int = 0 init(id: UUID = UUID(), name: String = "", photo: String = "", requirement: String = "", status: Bool = false, annotationId: UUID? = nil, number: Int = 0) { self.id = id self.name = name self.photo = photo self.requirement = requirement self.statue = status self.annotationId = annotationId self.number = number } } } Schema V2_5 static let versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(2, 5, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [AnnotationData.self, Person.self, GroupData.self, History.self] } // Keep the old Person model for migration @Model final class Person { @Attribute(.unique) var id: UUID var name: String var photo: String var requirement: String var statue: Bool var annotationId: UUID? var number: Int = 0 init(id: UUID = UUID(), name: String = "", photo: String = "", requirement: String = "", status: Bool = false, annotationId: UUID? = nil, number: Int = 0) { self.id = id self.name = name self.photo = photo self.requirement = requirement self.statue = status self.annotationId = annotationId self.number = number } } // Add the new GroupData model that mirrors Person @Model final class GroupData { @Attribute(.unique) var id: UUID var name: String var photo: String var requirement: String var status: Bool var annotationId: UUID? var number: Int = 0 init(id: UUID = UUID(), name: String = "", photo: String = "", requirement: String = "", status: Bool = false, annotationId: UUID? = nil, number: Int = 0) { self.id = id self.name = name self.photo = photo self.requirement = requirement self.status = status self.annotationId = annotationId self.number = number } } } Migration Plan static let migrationV2toV2_5 = MigrationStage.custom( fromVersion: LinkMapV2.self, toVersion: LinkMapV2_5.self, willMigrate: { context in do { let persons = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<LinkMapV2.Person>()) print("=== MIGRATION STARTED ===") print("Found \(persons.count) Person objects to migrate") guard !persons.isEmpty else { print("No Person data requires migration") return } for person in persons { print("Migrating Person: '\(person.name)' with ID: \(person.id)") let newGroup = LinkMapV2_5.GroupData( id: person.id, // Keep the same ID name: person.name, photo: person.photo, requirement: person.requirement, status: person.statue, annotationId: person.annotationId, number: person.number ) context.insert(newGroup) print("Inserted new GroupData: '\(newGroup.name)'") // Don't delete the old Person yet to avoid issues // context.delete(person) } try context.save() print("=== MIGRATION COMPLETED ===") print("Successfully migrated \(persons.count) Person objects to GroupData") } catch { print("=== MIGRATION ERROR ===") print("Migration failed with error: \(error)") } }, didMigrate: { context in do { // Verify migration in didMigrate phase let groups = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<LinkMapV2_5.GroupData>()) let oldPersons = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<LinkMapV2_5.Person>()) print("=== MIGRATION VERIFICATION ===") print("New GroupData count: \(groups.count)") print("Remaining Person count: \(oldPersons.count)") // Now delete the old Person objects for person in oldPersons { context.delete(person) } if !oldPersons.isEmpty { try context.save() print("Cleaned up \(oldPersons.count) old Person objects") } // Print all migrated groups for debugging for group in groups { print("Migrated Group: '\(group.name)', Status: \(group.status), Number: \(group.number)") } } catch { print("Migration verification error: \(error)") } } ) And I've attached console output below: Console Output

This app will not crash when switching between these two tabs with TabView init(content:) import SwiftUI import SwiftData struct ContentView: View { @StateObject private var highlightManager = HighlightManager.shared @State private var selectedTab: Int = 0 var body: some View { TabView(selection: $selectedTab) { MapView() .tabItem { Label("Map", systemImage: "map") } .tag(0) // Annotation Tab AnnotationList() .tabItem { Label("Annotation", systemImage: "mappin.and.ellipse") } .tag(1) // Group Tab PeopleList() .tabItem { Label("Group", systemImage: "person.and.person") } .tag(2) } .tutorialOverlay() // Apply the overlay to the root view .environmentObject(highlightManager) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .confirmationAction) { NavigationLink("Help") { NavigationStack { HelpView(selectedTab: selectedTab) } } } } } }

I'm trying to create a UI with two button bars (top and bottom) inside the detail view of a NavigationSplitView, instead of using the built-in .toolbar() modifier. I'm using .ignoresSafeArea(.container, edges: .vertical) so the detail view can reach into that area. However, in macOS and iOS 26 the top button is not clickable/tappable because it is behind an invisible View created by the non-existent toolbar. Interestingly enough, if I apply .buttonStyle(.borderless) to the top button it becomes clickable (in macOS). On the iPad the behavior is different depending on the iPad OS version. In iOS 26, the button is tappable only by the bottom half. In iOS 18 the button is always tappable. Here's the code for the screenshot: import SwiftUI struct ContentView2: View { @State private var sidebarSelection: String? @State private var contentSelection: String? @State private var showContentColumn = true @State private var showBars = true var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { // Sidebar List(selection: $sidebarSelection) { Text("Show Content Column").tag("three") Text("Hide Content Column").tag("two") } .navigationTitle("Sidebar") } detail: { VStack(spacing: 0) { if showBars { HStack { Button("Click Me") { withAnimation { showBars.toggle() } } .buttonStyle(.borderedProminent) } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity, minHeight: 50, idealHeight: 50, maxHeight: 50) .background(.gray) .transition(.move(edge: .top)) } ZStack { Text("Detail View") } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity, maxHeight: .infinity, alignment: .init(horizontal: .center, vertical: .center)) .border(.red) .onTapGesture(count: 2) { withAnimation { showBars.toggle() } } if showBars { HStack { Button("Click Me") { withAnimation { showBars.toggle() } } } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity, minHeight: 50, idealHeight: 50, maxHeight: 50) .background(.gray) .transition(.move(edge: .bottom)) } } .ignoresSafeArea(.container, edges: .vertical) .toolbarVisibility(.hidden) } .toolbarVisibility(.visible) } } I'm confused by this very inconsistent behavior and I haven't been able to find a way to get this UI to work across both platforms. Does anybody know how to remove the transparent toolbar that is preventing clicks/taps in this top section of the view? I'm hoping there's an idiomatic, native SwiftUI way to do it.

I have SwiftData models containing arrays of Codable structs that worked fine before adding CloudKit capability. I believe they are the reason I started seeing errors after enabling CloudKit. Example model: @Model final class ProtocolMedication { var times: [SchedulingTime] = [] // SchedulingTime is Codable // other properties... } After enabling CloudKit, I get this error logged to the console: 'NSKeyedUnarchiveFromData' should not be used to for un-archiving and will be removed in a future release CloudKit Console shows this times data as "plain text" instead of "bplist" format. Other struct/enum properties display correctly (I think) as "bplist" in CloudKit Console. The local SwiftData storage handled these arrays fine - this issue only appeared with CloudKit integration. What's the recommended approach for storing arrays of Codable structs in SwiftData models that sync with CloudKit?

According to Apple's documentation, SKOverlay is designed to recommend other applications to users. I'm seeking clarification on whether it also supports displaying update prompts for the host application itself. Use case: My app (for example, HelloDeveloper) is live at version 2.0, but some users are still on version 1.0. I want to display a soft update prompt that allows users to remain in the app. Question: Is it possible to use SKOverlay with my app's App Store ID to present an update option without requiring users to leave the app?